{"id":8927,"date":"2022-10-01T19:51:23","date_gmt":"2022-10-01T19:51:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/?p=8927"},"modified":"2022-10-06T12:45:34","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T12:45:34","slug":"do-execution-files-affect-business-status","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/do-execution-files-affect-business-status\/","title":{"rendered":"Do Execution Files Affect Business Status?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

Can Enforcement Files Terminate Employment (Affect Business Status)?<\/h2>\n

\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin, hakk\u0131ndaki icra dosyalar\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesi hakl\u0131 feshi olu\u015fturur.<\/span><\/p>\n

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong><\/p>\n

Esas:\u00a0<\/strong>2018\/6238<\/p>\n

Karar:\u00a0<\/strong>2019\/3907<\/p>\n

K.T.:<\/strong>\u00a018.2.2019<\/p>\n

DAVA :\u00a0<\/strong>Davac\u0131, feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine, i\u015fe iadesine ve yasal sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yerel mahkemece, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi\u2019nin ret karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 avukat\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

\u2026 Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Hukuk Dairesi;<\/p>\n

1-)Davac\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun Esastan Kabul\u00fcne,<\/p>\n

2-)\u2026 \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi\u2019nin \u2026 Esas 2017\/119 karar say\u0131l\u0131 27\/02\/2017 tarihli karar\u0131n\u0131n Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na,<\/p>\n

3-)Davac\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine i\u015fe iadesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u2026 Adliye Mahkemesi 25. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin karar\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla, dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten sonra dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

KARAR :\u00a0<\/strong>A-) Davac\u0131 \u0130steminin \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle; davac\u0131n\u0131n 01\/09\/1993 tarihinde daval\u0131 yan\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hi\u00e7bir ge\u00e7erli sebep olmaks\u0131z\u0131n 25\/11\/2016 tarihinde i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin sona erdi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin SGK\u2019na \u2026 sicil numaras\u0131 ile kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde Kargo i\u015f\u00e7isi olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta oldu\u011funu, \u00fccreti ayda 6.137,00 TL net ve i\u015f yerinde sa\u011flanan di\u011fer sosyal haklar oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin feshedildi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla i\u015fyerinde 30 dan fazla i\u015f\u00e7i \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fesih yaz\u0131s\u0131nda feshe gerek\u00e7e olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n \u201chesab\u0131ndaki hacizler ve i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile aralar\u0131ndaki bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkileri\u201d nin ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ancak g\u00f6sterilen bu gerek\u00e7enin do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu konuya ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n bile al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fesih gerek\u00e7esinin 4857say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015f yasas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f g\u00fcvencesine ili\u015fkin emredici h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n ilke kararlar\u0131na ve yerle\u015fik hale gelen i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n i\u015f akdinin feshedildi\u011fini, feshin makul s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin maa\u015f haczinin tek ba\u015f\u0131na bir ge\u00e7erli fesih sebebi olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f akdinin hakl\u0131 veya ge\u00e7erli sebebe dayanmadan feshedildi\u011fini beyan ederek i\u015fe iadesine karar\u0131 verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B-) Daval\u0131 Cevab\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n

Daval\u0131 vekili \u00f6zetle; davan\u0131n haks\u0131z ve yasal dayanaktan yoksun olarak a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011fn\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n ortakl\u0131klar\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131ktan itibaren icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fcklerince g\u00f6nderilen davac\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f\u0131na haciz talep yaz\u0131lar\u0131 ile m\u00fcvekkil firmalar\u0131n\u0131n muhasebe ve hukuk departman\u0131nn\u0131 gere\u011finden \u00e7ok fazlaca me\u015fgul etti\u011fini dair yaz\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011fden itibaren 6 ay i\u00e7inde icra dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli \u00e7aban\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi ve yeni bir icra dosyas\u0131ndan da m\u00fcvekkil \u015firkete haciz yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n gelmemesi i\u00e7in gerekli hassasiyetin g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekti\u011fini i\u00e7erir ihtar yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n 19\/02\/2015 tarihinde davac\u0131ya imzas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini, ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n bu ihtar yaz\u0131s\u0131na uygun davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bu zamana kadar mevcut olan icra dosya say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n zamanla artt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 29\/09\/2015 tarihli savunmas\u0131nda \u201d en k\u0131sa s\u00fcre de bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapataca\u011f\u0131m\u201d diyerek savunma verdi\u011fini, davac\u0131y\u0131 02\/11\/2015 tarihinde bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapatmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3 ay daha s\u00fcre verildi\u011fini, 3 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcrede haciz dosyalar\u0131n\u0131 kapatmayan davac\u0131ya iale olarak 10 ay daha s\u00fcre tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak yine de davac\u0131n\u0131n haciz dosyalar\u0131nda herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C-) Yerel Mahkeme Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti:<\/p>\n

Mahkemece, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a i\u015f akdinin ge\u00e7erli nedenle feshedildi\u011fi kabul edilerek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

\u00c7) \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusu :<\/p>\n

\u0130lk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, davac\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

D-) \u0130stinaf Sebepleri:<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda; davac\u0131n\u0131n fesih sebebine dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fesihten 1 ay s\u00f6nce fesih gerek\u00e7esi ile ilgisiz bir konuda \u201d verimsizli\u011fe \u201d ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fini, feshin makul s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmedi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f hesab\u0131ndaki hacizlere ili\u015fkin fesihten 1 y\u0131ldan daha uzun s\u00fcre \u00f6nce bildiriminde bulundu\u011fu, \u00fccret kesim cezas\u0131 uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirimin \u00fczerinden 1 y\u0131ldan uzun s\u00fcre ge\u00e7tikten sonra feshe ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu, fesih sebepleri olarak g\u00f6sterilen maa\u015f hacizlerinde bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkilerinden, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin i\u015f\u00e7ileri ile olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile i\u015f ili\u015fkisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisinin var olmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fverinin iznine veya onay\u0131na ba\u011flanabilicek bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisinin bir fesih sebebi olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile sorununun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 maa\u015f haczinin tek ba\u015f\u0131na ge\u00e7erli fesih sebebi olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 gere\u011fince ayn\u0131 eylemden dolay\u0131 iki ayr\u0131 ceza verilemeyece\u011fini, haciz dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00fccret kesim cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fini, ikinci ceza olarak feshe ba\u015fvurulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

E-) B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00d6zeti :<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, 24\/10\/2016 tarihli fesih bildiriminde 5 adet haciz dosyas\u0131n\u0131n 7 ye \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 2 g\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00fccret kesim cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi 10 ayl\u0131k s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapatmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ve haciz say\u0131s\u0131nda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu durumun i\u015f yerinde olumsuzluklara ve i\u015flerin aksamas\u0131na i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc planlamas\u0131n\u0131n olumsuz etkilenmesine neden oldu\u011fu i\u015f arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile bor\u00e7 al\u0131\u015fveri\u015finde bulunup onlarla sorun ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve i\u015fyeri huzurunu bozdu\u011fu 4857 Say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununun\u00a017, 18 ve\u00a019. maddeleri gere\u011fince i\u015f akdinin fesholdu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131ya hacizler dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 02\/Kas\u0131m\/2015 tarihinde 1931 Say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131 ile iki g\u00fcnl\u00fck \u00fccret kesim cezas\u0131 verildi\u011fi, ayn\u0131 eylem nedeniyle 24\/11\/2016 tarihinde fesih i\u015flemi yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 gere\u011fince ayn\u0131 olay nedeniyle iki ceza verilemeyecektir daval\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dumunu i\u015fyerinde olumsuzluklara, i\u015flerin aksamas\u0131na i\u015fyerinin i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc planlamas\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkiledi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n bor\u00e7 ili\u015fkisi nedeniyle \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma arkada\u015f\u0131 ile sorun ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve i\u015fyeri huzurunu bozdu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015fse de bu iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispatlar yeterli kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 deliller sunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve daval\u0131n\u0131n fesih sebebini ispatlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, gerek\u00e7esi ile istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcyle davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fe iadesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

F-) Temyiz ba\u015fvurusu :<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nin karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekili temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

G-) Gerek\u00e7e:<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ihtilaf, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan feshin hakl\u0131 veya ge\u00e7erli nedene dayan\u0131p dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7i hakk\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fik alacakl\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan \u00e7ok say\u0131da ve farkl\u0131 zamanlarda icrai i\u015flem ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n maa\u015f\u0131na haciz konuldu\u011fu, davac\u0131ya daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan 30.01.2015 tarihli yaz\u0131 ile davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00fccretinin kesilmesi hususunda icra m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7ok fazla oldu\u011fu ve bu durumun olduk\u00e7a \u00f6nemli i\u015fg\u00fcc\u00fc ve zaman kayb\u0131na sebep oldu\u011fu belirtilerek yaz\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 6 ay i\u00e7inde icra dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli \u00e7aban\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi ve ba\u015fka icra dosyalar\u0131ndan m\u00fcvekkil \u015firkete yaz\u0131lar gelmemesi i\u00e7in ihtar g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi ancak ihtar tarihinden sonra ge\u00e7en zamanda ve davac\u0131ya daval\u0131 i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan verilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda devam eden maa\u015f hacizlerinin sonlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 02.11.2015 tarihinde davac\u0131ya bu konuda \u00fc\u00e7 ayl\u0131k daha s\u00fcre tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131ya verilen s\u00fcrelere ra\u011fmen mevcut durumda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n 18.10.2016 tarihli savunmas\u0131nda da \u00f6nceki savunmalar\u0131 ile benzer ifadeler kullanarak \u00f6zetle \u201cborcunu \u00f6demeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ok \u00fczg\u00fcn ve utan\u00e7 i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funu ancak bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapatamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u201d belirtti\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine davac\u0131n\u0131n 23.11.2016 tarih ve 1971 Say\u0131l\u0131 icra komitesi karar\u0131 ile 25.11.2016 tarihinde ge\u00e7erli i\u015f akdine ge\u00e7erli sebeple son verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131n\u0131n aleyhine yap\u0131lan icra takiplerinin \u00e7oklu\u011fu i\u015fverenin muhasebe servisinin\/g\u00f6revlisinin buna ili\u015fkin i\u015flemler yapmak zorunda kalmas\u0131, i\u015fvereninde sorumlulu\u011funu do\u011furabilecek hallerin olu\u015fmas\u0131 riski kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerinde olumsuzluklara yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 ortadad\u0131r. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda feshin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Bu sebeple, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7elere dayal\u0131 karar\u0131 bozularak \u0130\u015f Kanunu\u2019nun 20\/3 maddesi uyar\u0131nca Dairemizce a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 :\u00a0<\/strong>Gerek\u00e7esi yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere;<\/p>\n

1-) B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nin temyiz edilen karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULARAK ORTADAN KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n

2-) Daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan feshin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan DAVANIN REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

3-) Al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 44,40 TL karar-ilam harc\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 29,20 TL pe\u015fin mahsubu ile bakiye 15,20 TL karar-ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131dan tahsili ile hazineye irat kayd\u0131na,<\/p>\n

4-) Davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarg\u0131lama giderinin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na, daval\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 250,00 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin davac\u0131dan tahsili ile daval\u0131ya \u00f6denmesine,<\/p>\n

5-) Karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan tarifeye g\u00f6re belirlenen 2.725,00 TL \u00fccreti vekaletin davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak daval\u0131ya verilmesine,<\/p>\n

6-) Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n iste\u011fi halinde daval\u0131ya iadesine, dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi\u2019ne, karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderilmesine, kesin olarak 18.02.2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Can Enforcement Files Terminate Employment (Affect Business Status)? \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin, hakk\u0131ndaki icra dosyalar\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015f akdinin feshedilmesi hakl\u0131 feshi olu\u015fturur. T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesi Esas:\u00a02018\/6238 Karar:\u00a02019\/3907 K.T.:\u00a018.2.2019 DAVA :\u00a0Davac\u0131, feshin ge\u00e7ersizli\u011fine, i\u015fe iadesine ve yasal sonu\u00e7lar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Yerel mahkemece, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi\u2019nin ret karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 avukat\u0131 istinaf […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8927"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}