{"id":8907,"date":"2022-10-01T19:42:15","date_gmt":"2022-10-01T19:42:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/?p=8907"},"modified":"2022-10-06T12:45:58","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T12:45:58","slug":"deleting-photos-from-the-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/deleting-photos-from-the-internet\/","title":{"rendered":"Deleting Photos from the Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-7822\" src=\"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/yargitay.fw_-300x291.jpg\" alt=\"YARGITAY KARARI\" width=\"300\" height=\"291\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/yargitay.fw_-300x291.jpg 300w, https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/yargitay.fw_.jpg 316w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<div id=\"tw-container\" class=\"\" data-cp=\"1\" data-is-ver=\"false\" data-nnttsvi=\"1\" data-sbsl=\"ru,uk\" data-sm=\"1\" data-ssbp=\"false\" data-sugg-time=\"500\" data-sugg-url=\"https:\/\/clients1.google.com\/complete\/search\" data-uilc=\"tr\">\n<div id=\"tw-ob\" class=\"tw-src-ltr\">\n<div class=\"oSioSc\">\n<div id=\"tw-target\">\n<div id=\"kAz1tf\" class=\"g9WsWb\">\n<div id=\"tw-target-text-container\" class=\"tw-ta-container F0azHf tw-nfl\" tabindex=\"0\">\n<h2 id=\"tw-target-text\" class=\"tw-data-text tw-text-large tw-ta\" dir=\"ltr\" data-placeholder=\"\u00c7eviri\"><span class=\"Y2IQFc\" lang=\"en\">What is the Supreme Court Decision on Photo Deletion from the Internet?<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><b><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">YARGITAY Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">ESAS:<\/span><\/b><b><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">\u00a0 \u00a0 2014\/56<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<div id=\"tw-container\" class=\"\" data-cp=\"1\" data-is-ver=\"false\" data-nnttsvi=\"1\" data-sbsl=\"ru,uk\" data-sm=\"1\" data-ssbp=\"false\" data-sugg-time=\"500\" data-sugg-url=\"https:\/\/clients1.google.com\/complete\/search\" data-uilc=\"tr\">\n<div>\n<div>\n<div id=\"tw-ob\" class=\"tw-src-ltr\">\n<div class=\"oSioSc\">\n<div id=\"tw-target\">\n<div id=\"kAz1tf\" class=\"g9WsWb\">\n<div id=\"tw-target-text-container\" class=\"tw-ta-container F0azHf tw-nfl\" tabindex=\"0\">\n<pre id=\"tw-target-text\" class=\"tw-data-text tw-text-large tw-ta\" dir=\"ltr\" data-placeholder=\"\u00c7eviri\"><span class=\"Y2IQFc\" lang=\"en\">What is the Supreme Court Decision on Photo Deletion from the Internet? In this article of the Supreme Court decision, we have discussed the decision made for you in detail.<\/span><\/pre>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"tw-target-rmn-container\" class=\"tw-target-rmn tw-ta-container F0azHf tw-nfl\">\n<pre id=\"tw-target-rmn\" class=\"tw-data-placeholder tw-text-small tw-ta\" dir=\"ltr\" data-placeholder=\"\"><\/pre>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"iYB33c\">\n<div class=\"dlJLJe\">\n<div data-cviv=\"false\" data-ved=\"2ahUKEwi-vOSV3b_6AhVKS_EDHcm7BbQQz_AEegQIAxAP\">\n<div class=\"U9URNb\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"dimg_3\" class=\"YQ4gaf zr758c wA1Bge\" src=\"data:image\/png;base64,iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABQAAAAUCAQAAAAngNWGAAAA\/0lEQVR4AYXNMSiEcRyA4cfmGHQbCZIipkuxnJgMStlMNmeyD2dwmc8+sZgxYJd9ErIZFHUyYYD7fkr6l4\/rnvmtl7+KitrqV\/fq2Y5eLY3Z9S48eRLe7BmVZ9qhTLhQ0algzZWQOVKSsCF8OjAnwbxDTWFDUhPK\/jMr1H6HE\/IqRky2DyvCefuwItwZzodVoYRiLqMkVCXrwpJ9twZ+sgfDYEFYl8wIWxZ9uFf7zkallxlJh4YrLGsKjZRx7VGHhLqwgFUN45DGdb8MeXGpgB4ABZdeDcpZEY51A+hyLKz4S1W4MQWm3AibWtgWmk6dyISa1pSdyWTOlLXVp0+eL9D\/ZPfBTNanAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC\" alt=\"Topluluk Taraf\u0131ndan Do\u011fruland\u0131 simgesi\" width=\"16\" height=\"16\" data-atf=\"0\" data-frt=\"0\" title=\"\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"tw-tmenu\" class=\"tw-menu\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"tw-images\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"dURPtb\"><\/div>\n<div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"KFFQ0c xKf9F\"><\/div>\n<p><b><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">E.\u00a0 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">KARAR:\u00a0 2015\/1679 K.<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>UNUTULMA HAKKI<\/li>\n<li>\u00d6ZEL HAYATIN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL<\/li>\n<li>YARGI KARARINDA ADI GE\u00c7EN K\u0130\u015e\u0130LER\u0130N RUMUZLANMADAN K\u0130TAPTA YER ALMASI<\/li>\n<li>MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI<\/li>\n<li>K\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130K HAKLARINA SALDIRI<\/li>\n<li>1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 27<\/li>\n<li>1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 20<\/li>\n<li>T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (TMK) (4721) Madde 24<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cmanevi tazminat\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; \u0130zmir 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesince davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 11.04.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/399 E. 2011\/172 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraflar vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesinin 08.11.2012 g\u00fcn ve 2011\/7193 E. 2012\/16450 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla;<br \/>\n\u201c&#8230;Dava, haks\u0131z fiil nedeni ile manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Yerel mahkemece istemin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc kabul edilmi\u015f; karar, taraflarca temyiz olunmu\u015ftur<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin cinsel taciz su\u00e7undan \u015fikayet\u00e7i oldu\u011fu ceza davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, mahkeme ilam\u0131n\u0131n temyizi sonras\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca verilen karar\u0131n daval\u0131lara ait Yorumlu-Uygulamal\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu adl\u0131 alt\u0131 ciltlik eserde m\u00fcvekkilinin ve di\u011fer ki\u015filerin isimlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011funu, belirterek daval\u0131lar\u0131n manevi tazminatla sorumlu tutulmalar\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Daval\u0131lar vekili, s\u00f6z konusu kitaplar\u0131n bilimsel eser niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda davalar\u0131n davac\u0131lar\u0131n ismiyle adland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kitab\u0131n geni\u015f kitlelere hitap etmedi\u011fi, ceza hakimleri, savc\u0131lar ve ceza avukatlar\u0131nca okundu\u011fu, kitapta isim belirtmenin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Mahkemece, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en eserde davac\u0131 ve di\u011fer ki\u015filerin isimlerinin kodlanmadan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu olaylar\u0131n anlat\u0131m\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a isim belirtmenin kitap i\u00e7eri\u011fine bir fayda sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, davac\u0131n\u0131n isminin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi olay\u0131n hassasiyeti ve T\u00fcrk toplum yap\u0131s\u0131 da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutuldu\u011funda, yurt \u00e7ap\u0131nda da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m\u0131 ve sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan bir kitapta, bu t\u00fcr bir olayla davac\u0131n\u0131n ad\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmesinin davac\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 zedeledi\u011fi, \u00e7evresine kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131y\u0131 zor duruma d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Bilimsel bilgi, ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zellikler dolay\u0131s\u0131yla fikir \u00fcretiminin en y\u00fcce de\u011fer ve bi\u00e7imi olma niteli\u011fine haizdir ve her\u015feyden \u00f6nce, insanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ger\u00e7ekli\u011fe ula\u015fmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli bir ara\u00e7 say\u0131l\u0131r. Bu durum, bilimsel bilgi ve onu \u00fcreten ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015f bir \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck alan\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Bilimi serbest\u00e7e \u00f6\u011frenme, ara\u015ft\u0131rma, yayma ve \u00f6\u011fretme haklar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren bilim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anayasada ki\u015fisel haklar aras\u0131nda (madde 27) d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan madde de herkesin bilim ve sanat\u0131 serbest\u00e7e \u00f6\u011frenme ve \u00f6\u011fretme, a\u00e7\u0131klama ve yayma ve bu konularda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu belirtilmektedir. Keza, AB Temel Haklar Bildirgesinin 13. maddesinde &#8220;sanat ve bilimsel ara\u015ft\u0131rma k\u0131s\u0131tlamaya tabi olmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Akademik \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmelidir&#8221; ibaresine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda bilimsel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck, bilimsel bir etkinlikte bulunan veya b\u00f6yle bir faaliyette bulunmak isteyen t\u00fcm bireylere tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve bu bireylerin ki\u015fili\u011fine s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 kalm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6znel temel hakt\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nem dolay\u0131s\u0131yla insan haklar\u0131 belgelerine giren bilim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ara\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ara\u015ft\u0131rma i\u00e7in zorunlu ara\u00e7lara ve ortama sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve bilimsel \u00fcretme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc veya bilgilendirme ve yay\u0131n hakk\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7erir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede bilim adam\u0131 bilimsel metotlar\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapma hakk\u0131na ve bu ara\u015ft\u0131rman\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yayma hakk\u0131na sahip olacak, kural olarak bu konularda d\u0131\u015f bir engelle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmayacakt\u0131r. Hatta bu konularda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015faca\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi engeller devlet taraf\u0131ndan ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn bir alt kategorisi olan fakat, \u00fcretilmesindeki \u00f6zel \u00e7aban\u0131n ya da eme\u011fin do\u011fal sonucu olarak, s\u0131radan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye g\u00f6re daha sistematik ve derin say\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken bilimsel eserler, kural olarak ancak kendi ilkeleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde s\u0131n\u0131r tan\u0131rlar ve istisnaen ancak insan ya\u015fam\u0131na y\u00f6nelen bir tehlike olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda k\u0131s\u0131tlanabilirler. Bunun \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7ilerek yap\u0131lan s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar, toplumun bilimsel d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle bulu\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyebilecek ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekli\u011fe ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyebilecektir. Bu bak\u0131mdan bilimsel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck hukuki rejim ve yapt\u0131r\u0131m a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan di\u011fer entelekt\u00fcel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere g\u00f6re daha mutlak bir \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck rejiminden yararlanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir. Fakat t\u00fcm \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerde oldu\u011fu gibi bilimsel \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck de s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z de\u011fildir. Bilim \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ki\u015filerin, ki\u015filik de\u011ferlerinin kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya geldi\u011fi durumlarda somut olaydaki olgular itibar\u0131yla koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f bulunan bu iki de\u011ferden birinin di\u011ferine \u00fcst\u00fcn tutulmas\u0131 gerekecektir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><span style=\"font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;\">Davaya konu olayda; bilimsel ara\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda, aleniyet kazanm\u0131\u015f ve kamu mal\u0131 haline gelmi\u015f Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131, taraflar\u0131n isimleri kodlanmadan daval\u0131lar\u0131n yazm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 Yorumlu-Uygulamal\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu adl\u0131 alt\u0131 ciltlik bilimsel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olan kitapta yay\u0131nlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en eserin bilimsel nitelikli bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma oldu\u011fu, kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k hale gelen Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131n bilimsel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olan kitapta oldu\u011fu gibi yer almas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yukar\u0131da anlat\u0131lan ilkeler \u011fere\u011fi daval\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlu tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131, \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan yararlar dengesinin davac\u0131 aleyhine bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu olay\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 te\u015fkil etmeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek davan\u0131n t\u00fcmden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011finden karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir&#8230;\u201d<br \/>\ngerek\u00e7esiyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>TEMY\u0130Z EDEN: Daval\u0131lar vekili<\/p>\n<p>HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI<br \/>\nHukuk Genel Kurulunca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<br \/>\nDava, ki\u015filik hakk\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 nedenine dayal\u0131 tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 M.. T.. vekili 16\/08\/2010 har\u00e7 tarihli dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u201cm\u00fcvekkilinin 14\/11\/2003 tarihinden beri \u0130zmir Adliyesinde savc\u0131l\u0131k zab\u0131t katibi olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 18\/07\/2005 ile 11\/04\/2006 tarihleri aras\u0131nda o d\u00f6nem \u0130zmir C. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 vekili olarak g\u00f6rev yapan Z&#8230;.ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmak i\u00e7in g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fini ancak ba\u015flad\u0131ktan sonra 8 ay boyunca Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 vekilinin s\u00f6zl\u00fc ve fiziksel taciziyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fiziksel tacizin ba\u015flamas\u0131 ve bu durumun \u00e7ekilmez hale gelmesi nedeniyle davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayette bulundu\u011funu, ailesinin ve \u00e7evresinin duymamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7aba sarf etti\u011fini, Z&#8230;. hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ba\u015fsavc\u0131 vekili olmas\u0131 nedeni ile olaylar\u0131n o d\u00f6nem i\u00e7in bas\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu olaylar\u0131 unutmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir d\u00f6nemde Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi Ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve tetkik hakimleri olan daval\u0131lar\u0131n Nisan 2010 tarihinde yorumlu-uygulamal\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu adl\u0131 alt\u0131 ciltlik eser yay\u0131nlad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6rnek Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 3262 nolu sayfa ve devam\u0131ndaki sayfalarda davac\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131na gelen olaylar\u0131n, t\u00fcm akt\u00f6rlerin isimlerinin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yaz\u0131lmak suretiyle ve olay\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan bu durumun \u00f6\u011frenilmesiyle davac\u0131n\u0131n tekrar psikolojik bunal\u0131ma girdi\u011fini, b\u00fct\u00fcn k\u00f6t\u00fc olaylar\u0131 tekrar ya\u015famak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, adliyede \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle bu olay\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7evresinde, savc\u0131 ve avukatlar taraf\u0131ndan duyuldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin zor da olsa saklayabildi\u011fi bir olay\u0131n kamuoyuna duyuruldu\u011funu, iffetinin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131r hale geldi\u011fini, bir gen\u00e7 k\u0131z\u0131n hayalleri ve gelece\u011finin kararm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, eserin bir defa yararlan\u0131lacak bir eser olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, uzun y\u0131llar boyunca yayg\u0131n kitlelerce okunacak nitelikte bulundu\u011funu belirterek t\u00fcm bu nedenlerle davac\u0131n\u0131n isminin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi s\u00f6z konusu ciltlerin toplat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, 50.000,00-TL manevi tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131lardan tahsiline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131lar O.. Y.., H.. T..G.., M.. A.. ve A.. Bas\u0131n Yay\u0131n ve Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m San. Ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti. vekili 11.10.2010 havale tarihli cevap dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u201c S\u00f6z konusu kitaplar\u0131n bilimsel eser niteli\u011finde oldu\u011funu, bilimsel eser niteli\u011finde olan kitaplarda fail ve ma\u011fdur ad\u0131n\u0131n olmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza hukukundaki kitaplar\u0131n\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131sal kararlar oldu\u011funu, geni\u015f kitlelere hitap etmedi\u011fini, ceza hakimleri, savc\u0131lar ve ceza avukatlar\u0131nca okundu\u011funu, kitapta isim belirtmenin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eserde ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en ki\u015filerle ilgili vak\u0131alar daha \u00f6nce yarg\u0131 konusu oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in ilgili mahkemelerin bulundu\u011fu yerlerdeki ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan duyulup \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fini, bu nedenle s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen vak\u0131alar\u0131n ilk defa dava konusu eserde g\u00fcndeme getirilmedi\u011fini, A\u0130HM kararlar\u0131n\u0131n ve Anayasa Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131n\u0131n da isimler \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmadan yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren UYAP sisteminde bulunan kararlardaki ki\u015fisel veriler rumuzlanmadan hakim ve savc\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava konusu karar\u0131n son b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde rumuzlama yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de ilk b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yap\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n dizgi hatas\u0131 oldu\u011funu, olay\u0131n \u00fczerine adliyeye gelen m\u00fcfetti\u015fin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda t\u00fcm adliyenin olay\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini ve olay\u0131n bas\u0131na da yans\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yine davac\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hususlar\u0131n daha sonra d\u00fczeltildi\u011fini ve d\u00fczeltilmi\u015f bir n\u00fcshas\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131 vekilini sunuldu\u011funu bu nedenle kitab\u0131n toplat\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 istenen tazminat\u0131n fahi\u015f oldu\u011funu savunarak\u201d davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\nMahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar\u0131n taraflarca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine yukar\u0131da ba\u015fl\u0131k b\u00f6l\u00fcmde yaz\u0131lan Yarg\u0131tay ilam\u0131 ile bozulmu\u015f, karar d\u00fczeltme istemi oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile reddedilmi\u015f, mahkemece \u00f6nceki gerek\u00e7eler tekrar edilerek direnilmi\u015f; h\u00fckm\u00fc daval\u0131lar vekili temyize getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; daval\u0131lar O.. Y.., H&#8230;. ve M.. A.. taraf\u0131ndan yay\u0131na haz\u0131rlanan ve daval\u0131lardan A.. Bas\u0131n Yay. Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m San ve Tic. Ltd. \u015eti taraf\u0131ndan bas\u0131lan eserde yer alan kararda, daval\u0131n\u0131n isminin rumuzlanmadan ve r\u0131zas\u0131 al\u0131nmadan a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik hakk\u0131nda sald\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<br \/>\n\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na girilmeden \u00f6nce davac\u0131ya ait 13.01.2014 tarihli dilek\u00e7enin temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n tahsil edilip edilmedi\u011finin belirlenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n mahkemesine geri \u00e7evrilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi \u00f6n sorun olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u015fu sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r:<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekiline gerek\u00e7eli karar 09.12.2013 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan mahkemeye verilmi\u015f bir dilek\u00e7e olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen 25.12.2013 (\u00c7ar\u015famba) tarihinde yaz\u0131 i\u015fleri m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131dan temyiz harc\u0131 tahsil edilmesi i\u00e7in m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n tahsiline dair tahsil\u00e2t makbuzu dosya i\u00e7inde bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bir di\u011fer deyi\u015fle s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f davac\u0131ya ait bir temyiz dilek\u00e7esi dosya i\u00e7inde bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Daval\u0131lara ait temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ise 30.12.2013 tarihinde davac\u0131 vekiline tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. 10 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresi 09.01.2014 (Per\u015fembe) sona erdikten sonra davac\u0131 vekili (dilek\u00e7e tarihi: 13.01.2014 pazartesi havale tarihi 13.01.2014) temyize cevap dilek\u00e7esi vermi\u015f direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131n\u0131; az olan miktar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden dosyan\u0131n incelenmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesi istenilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n hem as\u0131l hem de kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz s\u00fcresini ge\u00e7irdikten sonra verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e nedeni ile dosyan\u0131n geri \u00e7evrilmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oybirli\u011fi ile kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<br \/>\n\u0130\u015fin esas\u0131na gelince; uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde etkili yasal mevzuata bak\u0131lacak olursa;<\/p>\n<p>Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ilgili maddeleri;<br \/>\n\u00d6zel ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131<br \/>\n1. Herkes \u00f6zel ve aile hayat\u0131na, konutuna ve yaz\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<br \/>\n2. Bu hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na bir kamu makam\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahalesi, ancak m\u00fcdahalenin yasayla .\u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f ve demokratik bir toplumda ulusal g\u00fcvenlik, kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi, \u00fclkenin ekonomik refah\u0131, .d\u00fczenin korunmas\u0131, su\u00e7 i\u015flenmesinin \u00f6nlenmesi, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n veya ahlak\u0131n veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli bir tedbir olmas\u0131 durumunda s\u00f6z konusu olabilir.<br \/>\n\u015feklindedir.<br \/>\nT\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n ilgili maddeleri;<br \/>\n\u201cIX. Bilim ve sanat h\u00fcrriyeti<br \/>\nMadde 27 \u2013 Herkes, bilim ve sanat\u0131 serbest\u00e7e \u00f6\u011frenme ve \u00f6\u011fretme, a\u00e7\u0131klama, yayma ve bu alanlarda her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rma hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<br \/>\n&#8230;\u201d<br \/>\n\u201cA. \u00d6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fi<br \/>\nMadde 20\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Herkes, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. \u00d6zel hayat\u0131n ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fine dokunulamaz. (\u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc c\u00fcmle m\u00fclga: 3\/10\/2001-4709\/5 md.)<br \/>\n\u2026<br \/>\n(Ek f\u0131kra: 7\/5\/2010-5982\/2 md.) Herkes, kendisiyle ilgili ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Bu hak; ki\u015finin kendisiyle ilgili ki\u015fisel veriler hakk\u0131nda bilgilendirilme, bu verilere eri\u015fme, bunlar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesini veya silinmesini talep etme ve ama\u00e7lar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmeyi de kapsar. Ki\u015fisel veriler, ancak kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen hallerde veya ki\u015finin a\u00e7\u0131k r\u0131zas\u0131yla i\u015flenebilir. Ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin esas ve usuller kanunla d\u00fczenlenir.\u201d<br \/>\n\u015feklindedir.<br \/>\nT\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu\u2019nun ilgili maddeleri;<br \/>\n\u201cII. Sald\u0131r\u0131ya kar\u015f\u0131<br \/>\n1. \u0130lke<br \/>\nMadde 24- Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak ki\u015filik hakk\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131lan kimse, h\u00e2kimden, sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunanlara kar\u015f\u0131 korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyebilir.<br \/>\nKi\u015filik hakk\u0131 zedelenen kimsenin r\u0131zas\u0131, daha \u00fcst\u00fcn nitelikte \u00f6zel veya kamusal yarar ya da kanunun verdi\u011fi yetkinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 sebeplerinden biriyle hakl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131nmad\u0131k\u00e7a, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na yap\u0131lan her sald\u0131r\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<br \/>\n\u015feklindedir.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6n\u00fcm\u00fcze gelen sorunun temelinde unutulma hakk\u0131 ve bunun sonucu olan ki\u015fisel verilerin ve ki\u015filik hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ile bilim ve sanat h\u00fcrriyetinin birbiri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi yatmaktad\u0131r. Sorunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcnde dikkat edilmesi gereken husus, bilim ve sanat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bireyin temel haklar\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin kurulmas\u0131d\u0131r.<br \/>\nKi\u015fisel veri belli veya belirlenebilir olan ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczel bir ki\u015fiye ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc bilgiyi ifade eder. Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nin 95\/46\/EC say\u0131l\u0131 Bireylerin Ki\u015fisel Verilerinin \u0130\u015flenmesi ve Serbest\u00e7e Dola\u015f\u0131m\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Korunmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Direktif\u2019in 2\/a ve Ki\u015fisel Nitelikteki Verilerin Otomatik \u0130\u015fleme Tabi Tutulmas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u015eah\u0131slar\u0131n Korunmas\u0131na Dair 108 say\u0131l\u0131 Avrupa Konseyi S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin 2(a) maddelerinde benzer tan\u0131mlama yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131 insan haklar\u0131yla yak\u0131ndan ili\u015fkilidir.\u00a0\u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc ki\u015fisel verilerin a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 \u00f6ncelikle \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal edilebilece\u011fi gibi bir tak\u0131m di\u011fer ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 haklar\u0131 da zarar g\u00f6rebilir.<\/p>\n<p>A\u0130HS\u2019de ki\u015fisel verilerle ilgili bir h\u00fck\u00fcm yoktur. Ancak mahkeme konuyla ilgili kararlar\u0131nda ki\u015fisel veri i\u00e7eri\u011fini doldurmu\u015ftur. Hemen ifade edilmesi gerekir ki ki\u015fisel verinin say\u0131sal olarak s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Ancak i\u00e7tihatlar ve akademik yay\u0131nlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bireyin kimli\u011fini ortaya \u00e7\u0131kartan, bir ki\u015fiyi belirli k\u0131lan ve karakterize eden ki\u015finin kimlik, ekonomik ve dijital bilgileri, tabiiyeti, kanaatleri, \u0131rk, siyasi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, felsef\u00ee inan\u00e7, din, mezhep veya di\u011fer inan\u00e7lar\u0131, dernek, vak\u0131f ve sendika \u00fcyeli\u011fi, sa\u011fl\u0131k bilgileri, foto\u011fraflar\u0131, parmak izi, sa\u011fl\u0131k verileri, telefon mesajlar\u0131, telefon rehberi, sosyal payla\u015f\u0131m sitelerinde yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya payla\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaz\u0131, foto\u011fraf, ses veya g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ki\u015fisel verileri olarak kabul edilebilir.<\/p>\n<p>Ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131, \u00e7a\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda, insan haklar\u0131 kavram\u0131 ve korunmas\u0131 bilincinin gittik\u00e7e geli\u015fmesine paralel olarak \u00f6nemini art\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. Ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n temel amac\u0131, bireyin \u00f6zel ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011finin g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 yoluyla ki\u015fiyi korumakt\u0131r. Bilgi toplumunda giderek olduk\u00e7a \u00f6nemli bir konu haline gelen ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131, bireyin, demokratik bir hukuk devletinde \u00f6zg\u00fcr iradesiyle kendi ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 bizzat d\u00fczenleyebilmesinin bir gere\u011fi olarak kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan bireyin ki\u015fili\u011fini serbest\u00e7e geli\u015ftirmesi, ki\u015fili\u011finin korunmas\u0131 ve \u00f6zg\u00fcr bireylerden olu\u015fan bir toplum d\u00fczeninin olu\u015fturulmas\u0131, ancak bireyin ki\u015fisel verilerine ili\u015fkin hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131yla m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu hak yukar\u0131da ifade edildi\u011fi \u00fczere TC Anayasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 20\/2 maddesinde a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Unutulma hakk\u0131na gelince; unutulma hakk\u0131 ve bununla ili\u015fkili olan gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde ve en k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli\u011fine ki\u015fisel verilerin depolanmas\u0131 veya tutulmas\u0131 konular\u0131, asl\u0131nda ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7at\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Her iki hakk\u0131n temelinde bireyin ki\u015fisel verileri \u00fczerinde serbest\u00e7e tasarruf edebilmesini, ge\u00e7mi\u015fin engeline tak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n gelece\u011fe y\u00f6nelik plan yapabilmesini, ki\u015fisel verilerin ki\u015fi aleyhine kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesini sa\u011flamak yatmaktad\u0131r. Unutulma hakk\u0131 ile ge\u00e7mi\u015finde kendi iradesi ile veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015finin neden oldu\u011fu bir olay nedeni ile ki\u015finin gelece\u011finin olumsuz bir \u015fekilde etkilenmesinin engellenmesi sa\u011flanmaktad\u0131r. Bireyin ge\u00e7mi\u015finde ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olumsuz etkilerden kurtularak gelece\u011fini \u015fekillendirebilmesi bireyin yarar\u0131na oldu\u011fu gibi toplumun kalitesinin geli\u015fmi\u015flik seviyesinin y\u00fckselmesine etkisi de tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmazd\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Unutulma hakk\u0131; \u00fcst\u00fcn bir kamu yarar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece, dijital haf\u0131zada yer alan ge\u00e7mi\u015fte ya\u015fan\u0131lan olumsuz olaylar\u0131n bir s\u00fcre sonra unutulmas\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n bilmesini istemedi\u011fi ki\u015fisel verilerin silinmesini ve yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlemesini isteme hakk\u0131 olarak ifade edilebilir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu hak bir yandan ki\u015fiye \u201cge\u00e7mi\u015fini kontrol etme\u201d, \u201cbelirli hususlar\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015finden silinmesini ve hat\u0131rlanmamay\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131\u201d sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, di\u011fer yandan muhataplar\u0131na ki\u015fi hakk\u0131ndaki bir k\u0131s\u0131m bilgilerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin kullanmamas\u0131n\u0131 veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin hat\u0131rlamamas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik \u00f6nlenmeleri alma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00fckler. Bu hakk\u0131n; bireylerin foto\u011fraf, internet g\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi kendileri hakk\u0131ndaki i\u00e7erikleri silmek i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 zorlamay\u0131 i\u00e7ermesinin yan\u0131nda ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki cezalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgilerin veya haklar\u0131nda olumsuz yorumlara neden olabilecek bilgi ve foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Di\u011fer taraftan bu hak, bireyin ge\u00e7mi\u015findeki belirli y\u00f6nlerinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayacak bi\u00e7imde hat\u0131rlanmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6nlemler al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (A\u0130HS)\u2019nin 8. maddesinde yer alan \u00f6zel ya\u015fama sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 alt\u0131nda korunan \u201cmahremiyet hakk\u0131\u201dn\u0131n, bireyin kendisi hakk\u0131ndaki bilgileri kontrol edebilmesi \u015feklindeki hukuki \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131n\u0131 da i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ifade edilmektedir. Zira bireyin kendisine ait herhangi bir bilginin, kendi r\u0131zas\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmamas\u0131, yay\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve bu bilgilere ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n ula\u015famamas\u0131 k\u0131sacas\u0131 ki\u015fisel verilerinin mahrem kalmas\u0131 konusunda hukuki menfaati bulunmaktad\u0131r. ( G\u00fclay Arslan \u00d6nc\u00fc, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinde \u00d6zel Ya\u015fam\u0131n Korunmas\u0131, Beta Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul 2011, s.182)<br \/>\nKi\u015fiye unutulma hakk\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ile birlikte \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011fi korunmu\u015f olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olaya bu kapsamda bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; davac\u0131, kamu g\u00f6revinin veya hizmet ili\u015fkisinin sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 n\u00fcfuzu k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanarak, m\u00fcteselsilen cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7unun ma\u011fdurudur. 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylem tarihinde davac\u0131 bek\u00e2r olup maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylem gelece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan etkilidir. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda kamu g\u00f6revlisi olan san\u0131k ceza alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Temyiz istemi \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda ise h\u00fck\u00fcm 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ma\u011fdur davac\u0131 gerek haz\u0131rl\u0131k gerekse de yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n nas\u0131l ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde anlatm\u0131\u015f, bu anlat\u0131mlar do\u011fal olarak karar metnine ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir. Karar ma\u011fdur ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ismi rumuzlanmadan 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 nisan ay\u0131nda yay\u0131nlanan kitapta yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>\nHemen ifade edilmelidir ki; davac\u0131n\u0131n r\u0131zas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bir kitapta ge\u00e7en ismi ki\u015fisel veri niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca \u015funun da ifade edilmesi gereklidir ki; unutulma hakk\u0131 tan\u0131mlar\u0131na bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda her ne kadar dijital veriler i\u00e7in d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ise de, bu hakk\u0131n \u00f6zellikleri ve bu hakk\u0131n insan haklar\u0131yla aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkisi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; yaln\u0131zca dijital ortamdaki ki\u015fisel veriler i\u00e7in de\u011fil, kamunun kolayca ula\u015fabilece\u011fi yerde tutulan ki\u015fisel verilere y\u00f6nelik olarak da kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc bir olay\u0131n toplum haf\u0131zas\u0131ndan silinmesini istemektedir. Unutulma hakk\u0131 ile ge\u00e7mi\u015findeki ya\u015fanan talihsiz bir olay\u0131n unutularak gelece\u011fini serbest\u00e7e \u015fekillendirmek, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle hayat\u0131nda, yeni bir sayfa a\u00e7ma olana\u011f\u0131 istemektedir. Kald\u0131 ki, davac\u0131 da yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda verdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7elerinde bu istem \u00fczerinde \u0131srarla durmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131 unutulma hakk\u0131 ile \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin ki\u015fisel verilerinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan bilinmemesini, aradan ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre nedeniyle toplum haf\u0131zas\u0131ndan silinmesini istemektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu ba\u011flamda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; 4 y\u0131l \u00f6nce ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen bir olay\u0131n ma\u011fduru olan ki\u015finin ad\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde yaz\u0131larak kitapta yer almas\u0131 halinde unutulma hakk\u0131n\u0131n bunun sonucunda da davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n\u0131n gizlili\u011finin ihlal edildi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir. Avrupa Birli\u011fi Adalet Divan\u0131\u2019n\u0131n \u201cGoogle Karar\u0131\u201dnda a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ilgili verinin kamu hayat\u0131nda oynad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6nemli rol ve halk\u0131n ilgili veriye y\u00f6nelik yo\u011fun ilgisi \u015feklinde, \u00fcst\u00fcn bir kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan \u00f6zel sebepler bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re bilimsel esere al\u0131nan kararda ki\u015fisel veriler a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde yer almamal\u0131d\u0131r.<br \/>\nG\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda az\u0131nl\u0131kta kalan \u00fcyeler mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda yer alan isimlerin rumuzlanmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n istisnalar haricinde a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn alenen tefhim edildi\u011fini, bu nedenle \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011finin ihlal edilmedi\u011fini savunmu\u015flar ise bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f \u201csorunun mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda isimlerin rumuzlanmadan yer almas\u0131 de\u011fil, kararlar\u0131n kitaba al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda rumuzlanmas\u0131 gerekip gerekmedi\u011fi sorunu oldu\u011fu\u201d gerek\u00e7esi ile kurul \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde davac\u0131n\u0131n isminin rumuzlanmadan kitapta yer almas\u0131n\u0131n unutulma hakk\u0131n\u0131 ve bunun neticesinde \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal etti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131 lehine manevi tazminat ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin kabul\u00fc zorunludur.<\/p>\n<p>Ne var ki, \u00d6zel Dairece tazminat miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu y\u00f6ne ili\u015fkin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n \u00d6zel Daireye g\u00f6nderilmesi gerekir.<br \/>\nS O N U \u00c7: Yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle yerel mahkemenin direnme karar\u0131 yerinde bulundu\u011fundan tazminat miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkemenin kurdu\u011fu h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n 4. Hukuk Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 17.06.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is the Supreme Court Decision on Photo Deletion from the Internet? YARGITAY Hukuk Genel Kurulu \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ESAS:\u00a0 \u00a0 2014\/56 What is the Supreme Court Decision on Photo Deletion from the Internet? In this article of the Supreme Court decision, we have discussed the decision made for you in detail. E.\u00a0 KARAR:\u00a0 2015\/1679 K. UNUTULMA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[146],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-decisions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/egehukukofisi.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}